According to Women, the reason many could not support Clinton was because of her Husband Bill.
All of the Trump voting women I talked to said they would have supported Clinton if she would have done one of the three following things after having found out her Husband cheated on her,
a.) Cut his dick off
b.) Left him
or
c.) All of the above.
And you know, I can't seem to disagree with them... If she lets Bill walk all over her, and she can't even stick up for herself, then how in the world could any American, Male or Female, support her? And what experience did she have to even run for President? Her entire tenure as Security of State was tarnished with controversy. She was in essence, nothing more than a proxy for her Husband to clench a 3rd term!
Go ahead, try and say it ain't so!
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
No doubt the facts in your post holds weight in the real sense of the word, but maybe the real "Powers-that-be" were trying out the American public again on their allusion to having a female President...Everyone seemed to sing-songs-&-dance when a colored President Obama was elected, so why not try a female elected President ?....
England, Oz, NZ & even India ( & others ) have had female leaders so far, so I guess maybe America was trying to feel the same thing out ?
Ciao,
Rastus
__________________
"Only an alert & knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial & military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods & goals, so that security & liberty may prosper together". Dwight D.Eisenhower.
Actually almost 3 million more Americans supported Hillary than Trump. It is one of the largest popular vote landslides in history, but just not in the right places to get the electoral votes needed.
Everyone knows that such numbers only back up the claims of many who say sanctuary cities and voter fraud go hand in hand. Only the costal states went for Hillary, and lets be honest... California is a Democrat bastion that would vote democrat regardless who was running. It's pathetic really, and if Trump does the job he was hired for then this "popular" vote anomaly should almost be ZERO come the 2020 election.
Under no circumstances should we allow a few liberal, overcrowded sanctuary cities to hold a disproportionate amount of influence over the nation. Half these places where Hillary won don't even require ID to vote, from what I understand. To me, any vote made without proving ID should be void.
Take Detroit for example... Half the districts were uncountable!
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
So you're suggesting the vote of a knuckle dragging rural citizen should carry more weight than that of a costal elite? Trump himself is on record as thinking the electoral college should be abolished in favor of the popular vote, that is until he won with the electoral college. I think he has now flip flopped on that issue, but that is nothing new.
You didn't get the memo with your costumes? It's now the Democrats who are the mouth breathing, knuckle dragging, angry party. Wear them well and wear them with pride!
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
1-vote from 1-American Citizen should = 1-vote from an American Citizen.
New President should = 50+% of the vote. - ( Or greatest percentage of votes ).
Cheers,
Rastus
-- Edited by Rastus on Saturday 14th of January 2017 08:21:50 PM
__________________
"Only an alert & knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial & military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods & goals, so that security & liberty may prosper together". Dwight D.Eisenhower.
1-vote from 1-American Citizen should = 1-vote from an American Citizen.
New President should = 50+% of the vote. - ( Or greatest percentage of votes ).
Cheers,
Rastus
Rastus, you know nothing of illegal US immigration! Ours is nothing like yours over there, where they actually enforce it. When 50% of a major cities districts can not be counted because of irregularities in the voter count vs. the actual amount of registered voters... Well that should about explain the reason we have Hillary with 3,000,000 extra votes nationally. The creators of our constitution knew even back then what overpopulated coastal cities were capable of in terms unfairly influencing elections. Still, Hillary and the Democrats have blamed everything else but the simple fact she was dirty. She's blamed everyone, including the Russians. She was nothing more than a proxy for her husband to clinch a 3rd term and everyone knew it. I am so glad she lost! Nothing good ever happened under Bill Clintons administration.
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
I had no idea of immigration being so poorly taken care of, & the problems of vote-counting. I guess that lots of folks like to have a vote now-days....Here in Oz, lots of us were envious that folks in the US-of-A didn't have to vote if they didn't want to. You're fined here in Oz if you don't vote. I appreciate the update guys.
I agree with PowerStroker that there was a time of relative peace & prosperity during the Clinton administration, & lots of laughter too regarding Monica among other things like Climate Change...
Mr.Bush only showed the world that you can get away with murder, & even shit in your own back-yard & not get blamed. In fact, he proved that you can blame some-one else in Afghanistan for doing it, & then invade an entirely different nation for the said turd... Maybe we'll discuss some of the events of 9/11 in the Illuminati thread, if the topic wanders that way.
Let's see what Mr.Trump has in store for us, time will soon tell...( Gasoline has increased over 10% here in Oz in the last week, so I guess that means he's going to let Rastus find some employment again soon...(This is a good sign for Rastus, though it sucks for most folks )).
Cheers,
Rastus
-- Edited by Rastus on Sunday 15th of January 2017 04:02:30 AM
__________________
"Only an alert & knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial & military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods & goals, so that security & liberty may prosper together". Dwight D.Eisenhower.
Except for the whole peace and prosperity thing that is.
You have got to be kidding, right? Clinton was impeached, and his administration cooked the books!
I dont recall any of this "prosperity" you speak of PowerStroker! Unless you count an economic bubble and countless people getting home loans for two or three times their value only to end up losing their homes later down the road. Drug and alcohol use was rampant under the Clintons and his entire term netted nothing in terms of the advancement of America or its citizens!
Anyone who thinks the arrogant and selfish Clinton Administration was anything but a failure has to be a Democrat! Bill Clinton thought he was so smart, and even in this most recent election where his wife was running by proxy for him, he still thought he was so smart. Bragging all the time about his college education, trying to identify with college educated people and dismissing others as a "basket of deplorables". Well guess what!? All his college educated friends were all buried in student debt, much like his base was all indebted for more than their homes were worth during his administration. They deserved to lose and this nation will be far better off without them in office!
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
I had no idea of immigration being so poorly taken care of, & the problems of vote-counting. I guess that lots of folks like to have a vote now-days....Here in Oz, lots of us were envious that folks in the US-of-A didn't have to vote if they didn't want to. You're fined here in Oz if you don't vote. I appreciate the update guys.
I agree with PowerStroker that there was a time of relative peace & prosperity during the Clinton administration, & lots of laughter too regarding Monica among other things like Climate Change...
Mr.Bush only showed the world that you can get away with murder, & even shit in your own back-yard & not get blamed. In fact, he proved that you can blame some-one else in Afghanistan for doing it, & then invade an entirely different nation for the said turd... Maybe we'll discuss some of the events of 9/11 in the Illuminati thread, if the topic wanders that way.
Let's see what Mr.Trump has in store for us, time will soon tell...( Gasoline has increased over 10% here in Oz in the last week, so I guess that means he's going to let Rastus find some employment again soon...(This is a good sign for Rastus, though it sucks for most folks )).
Cheers,
Rastus
There was absolutely nothing funny or humorous about the Monica Lewenski scandal Rastus, unless of course you lived in Oz! LOL! The term relative is being used very loosely with regards to peace and prosperity! Regardless what side of the isle you were on, you were getting fu@ked... only Democrats don't mind getting fu@ked by their own.
Say what you want about G.W. but he took on Iraq and won. You don't know anything but what you've been told as it pertains to Iraq however I can assure you that after 9/11 an example had to be made. You disagree but it doesn't change the facts. Is Iraq better off than it was under Saddam? You bet it is! At least as far as Americans safety is concerned!
And what do we have to show for Americas 8 long years of war under Obama? A few billion dollar gas stations in remote parts of Afghanistan? Countless billions of dollars in cash to Iran? The pullout of our troops in Iraq that created ISIS in the vacuum?
You must have been holding your sides from laughing so hard when you wrote this satirical response above.
-- Edited by SELLC on Sunday 15th of January 2017 10:36:55 AM
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
Maybe, but only a part. I won't venture to say I have intelligence reports or access to such classified information but I seen some documentaries where Saddam was getting pretty out of control, even with his own people. However, when the verdict came down to invade Iraq, your Clinton pals were on the "yea" column pointing their fingers at Iraq too.
So, how do you explain that?
-- Edited by SELLC on Sunday 15th of January 2017 04:00:53 PM
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
1. I did find the whole Monica-affair quite funny to be honest. When I first heard about it, all that was said by Mr.Clinton was "I did not have sexual relations with that girl" whilst looking the camera straight in the eye. And well, we all know what happened next LOL....
Politicians...One lie after another, & all to keep up appearances, often in the interests of National Security...
2. Saddam had apparently been made an enemy by the "Elite" way back in 1977, according to the secretary of Mr. Von Braun ( Ex-Nazi, & NASA rocket engineer )...But as crazy as the Arabs are ( & they're ****ing crazy folks ), Saddam actually had the ability to bring relative peace to the Middle East, & its nations. This is why the "Elite" saw him as an enemy...They knew already in the 1970's that if you eliminate Saddam, you'll have instability...And this would be the perfect opportunity for the "Elite" to send in the US-of-A military, to stabilize peace, & build that oil pipe-line......
All Saddam did was rightfully tell you to fuck-off, & mind your own business ! And now the country ( & your soldiers ) are dying since Uranium-weapons were used in both of Bush's wars, effectively destroying the people & country into extinction...And of course the UN held sanctions too so as to ensure that survivors had no food or water. Aren't we such a humane society...
3. Of course, Mr.Bush had the cheek to look under his table for the "weapons of mass destruction", & then say on camera, "Nope, they're not under here" to thunderous applause...
I still don't completely understand why Mr.Bush would OK the destruction of the Word Trade Center buildings & fire a missile into the Pentagon claiming it was a air-plane, whilst also delaying the response of your air-force for over 45-minutes to intercept the remaining hi-jacked air-planes, if they even existed....
Some say it was false-flag attempt to try & enforce tighter gun-laws in the US-of-A, & thus modify your constitutional rights as citizens...Which he had already done on a number of occasions, with the most impressive move ( I think ) to be able at his own discretion, apply Martial Law throughout the US-of-A.
Cheers,
Rastus
__________________
"Only an alert & knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial & military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods & goals, so that security & liberty may prosper together". Dwight D.Eisenhower.
