RIP Mr. Raynor & Ms.Fisher.

The world we live in hey ?...

Apparent murder suicide, PowerStroker?

Nothing reeks more of a cover-up more than that!

Look at you just turning your head the other way! I have to say you really have become unhinged lately PowerStroker! From your tantrum with the signature photo it's obvious you are getting close to the edge buddy...

You and I both know the media is not going to touch a story until an indictment or charge has been handed down.

Many theories take awhile to get facts checked, and interestingly enough there is always some truth to whatever outrageous hypothesis gets printed or mentioned.

I agree it's not mainstream enough to call fact, but it fails the sniff test when looking at the Clinton body count as a whole over the years.

Seems a lot of Clinton's people die in freak accidents or murder suicides...

I think that is the narrative here PowerStroker, even though I see you looking the other way as I hold it up in front of your face.

PowerStroker wrote:___________________________________________

Is any real media reporting about your alleged grand jury testimony? Usually such things are kept secret.

Fast and Furious started under the Bush administration under a different name anyway, the Obama admin put an end to it.

---

 Yeah, they ended it after it was a fiasco and border agents killed. Holder in contempt.

 

Awful lot of "coincidences" attached to Klintoons, far too many. Usually the day before testifying.

PowerStroker wrote:

---

But your "news" story says he was about to give testimony to the Grand Jury, can you prove this with a real media outlet? A Grand Jury schedule, or something?

---

 Can one prove any of the 70 or so convenient deaths connected to Klintoons? 

Real media outlet? Kind of an oxymoron isn't that?

I'm not privi to grand jury schedules. Do we have access to that stuff? Be nice to.

PowerStroker wrote:

---

I'm asking you to do something much easier than prove murders, just prove he was about to give testimony to a Grand Jury please.

Nobody has access to Grand Jury schedules, not you, not me, and not your propaganda rag that published it. That's how I know it's not real.

-- Edited by PowerStroker on Sunday 24th of June 2018 05:35:33 PM

---

 Don't know but I will look. Valid request for sure.

That's just the thing, Nobody can find a grand jury schedule becuase almost always, a grand jury is impaneled in complete secrecy so the target of an investigation would have no foreknowledge of its existence. That way indictments and warrants can be issued before the target of an investigation can have the opportunity to destroy evidence. For your propaganda rag to publish the "fact" that a grand jury was about to take testimony from the FBI agent is highly suspect. First, they could only gain that kind of information from a leak within the actual grand jury which is highly unlikely. And second, to publish it is to warn the Clintons about it's existence, which would seem counter to the goals of what your publication wants based on the other stories on their website.

And so, I hereby call bullshit. I believe the FBI agent is dead, I don't believe he was about to testify to a grand jury about Fast and Furious.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

From Wikipedia:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_juries_in_the_United_States

Grand jury proceedings are secret. No judge is present; the proceedings are led by a prosecutor;[15] and the defendant has no right to present his case or (in many instances) to be informed of the proceedings at all. While court reporters usually transcribe the proceedings, the records are sealed. The case for such secrecy was unanimously upheld by the Burger Court in Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 US 211 (1979).[16][17] The dissenting opinion was joined by Justices Burger and Stewart but concurred with the Court's opinion as to the importance and rationale of grand jury secrecy. Writing for the Court, Justice Powell found that "if preindictment proceedings were made public, many prospective witnesses would be hesitant to come forward voluntarily"; "witnesses who appeared before the grand jury would be less likely to testify fully and frankly"; and "there also would be the risk that those about to be indicted would flee, or would try to influence individual grand jurors". Further, "persons who are accused but exonerated by the grand jury [should] not be held up to public ridicule".[16]

United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., 356 US 677 (1958), permitted the disclosure of grand jury transcripts under certain restrictions: "a private party seeking to obtain grand jury transcripts must demonstrate that 'without the transcript a defense would be greatly prejudiced or that without reference to it an injustice would be done'" and must make its requests "with particularity".[16] Further, First Amendment protections generally permit the witnesses summoned by a grand jury to discuss their testimony, although Dennis v. United States, 384 US 855 (1966), found that such public discussion permits release of the transcripts of their actual testimony.[16]

The Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, requires the government to disclose to the defense any statements made by the accused to the grand jury, and, with respect to non-party witnesses, that after a witness has testified on direct examination at trial, any statement made to the grand jury by such witness be disclosed to the defense.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I really wish you would remove yourself from the mailing lists you are on, and seek more credible sources of news. You are better than this.