Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Another brilliant Dem plan


FAR BEYOND DRIVEN

Status: Offline
Posts: 4753
Date:
RE: Another brilliant Dem plan


PowerStroker wrote:

Are you talking about bump stocks? Because I think they should be banned. I really don't know specifically what I said about guns that got you pissed off, though I would like to add a 3rd group of people who I think should be banned from having guns (people on the no fly list).


No it's about the BATFe FBI Nics check, 4473. About 11 questions last I looked. Pot user, felon, mental, convicted of domestic violence etc no gun.

Nothing should be banned or regulated, at all. 

Bump stocks are ridiculous but nothing shall be infringed upon. Commit a crime, go to prison or hang.

Better off and safer banning illegals. Illegals have killed FAR more innocent people than the single incident of the bumpstock in Vegas.



__________________
Drive it like you stole it


UNSTOPPABLE!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6268
Date:

I think we'll have to agree to disagree on bump stocks.

Do you think people should be able to purchase fully automatics without any infringement too?

__________________

ukraine-flag-nomonkey-b - QRZ NOW - Ham Radio News



FAR BEYOND DRIVEN

Status: Offline
Posts: 4753
Date:

Full autos? ABSOLUTELY. 1934 MG act was one of the worse. Jackboots do anything they want to. Such as label a suppressor as a firearm. In the 68 GCA there is a distinct definition of a firearm and a sound suppressor is not it. They reduce the sound, not eliminate lt like in hollywood. Hearing protection.

Bump stocks are shit, useless devices to spray bullets inaccurately. Only one has ever been used in a crime, Vegas. Why? They suck. Got news for you, a string, rubberband, even your finger will bump a rifle. Lets ban those too, huh?

Seeing as a bumpstock was used once in a crime lets use a leftist analogy along the same line.

If there is a weed in your lawn do you pull it out, or bulldoze it and pour a cement yard?

__________________
Drive it like you stole it


FAR BEYOND DRIVEN

Status: Offline
Posts: 4753
Date:

BTW, I have owned full auto and they never went out and shot anyone.

It's the person, not the gun, you leftist will never get it. ROOT CAUSE, get to that.

Stop the illegals, stop letting them go with a slap on the wrist, stop letting them out of prison in droves like odumbo did.

__________________
Drive it like you stole it


FAR BEYOND DRIVEN

Status: Offline
Posts: 4753
Date:

Here is a PDF to a 4473, you can read all the "govt" questions which will ban someone.

www.atf.gov/firearms/docs/4473-part-1-firearms-transaction-record-over-counter-atf-form-53009/download

a thru i cover what you worried about very clearly. Read them it will put your worries to ease

__________________
Drive it like you stole it


No longer a user - left on their own accord.

Status: Offline
Posts: 766
Date:

PowerStroker wrote:

I think we'll have to agree to disagree on bump stocks.

Do you think people should be able to purchase fully automatics without any infringement too?


 

Already asked and answered...

 

Asking again does not change the response...

 

NO the government has no authority to ban fully automatic weapons...

 

I could see that one actually making it as an amendment to the constitution...

 

but the ban on ANY semi automatic is just pure overreach by the government....

 

 

 



__________________


UNSTOPPABLE!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6268
Date:

I'm hearing basically that no firearm should be unobtainable, but the people can be regulated. Does that mean you guys would agree to people being licensed and perhaps insured for firearms like we do with automobiles? And the trade off cold be that more things (even some fully autos) would be available for purchase to the people who get the license and insurance?

Because if that's the case, you could probably get enough Dems on board to pass it.




-- Edited by PowerStroker on Wednesday 8th of May 2019 07:01:23 PM

__________________

ukraine-flag-nomonkey-b - QRZ NOW - Ham Radio News



FAR BEYOND DRIVEN

Status: Offline
Posts: 4753
Date:

I mentioned it already, the honest law abiding people ARE regulated. Read the 4473 I posted? That will show you the regs to buy a firearm, a thru i, couple minute read. There are many more regs called the 68 GCA, book is 5/8" thick now, back in 72 wasn't much over a 1/4"

Many of us are already licensed. ATF knows every detail of every gun I own. I was a dealer/manufacturer over 2 decades.

Insurance is available in case you need to defend yourself. Even totally justified self defense will run $100K

__________________
Drive it like you stole it


UNSTOPPABLE!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6268
Date:

Well I can definitely see both sides to this. Certainly the overwhelming majority of gun owners are responsible and never cause a problem, and I don't want to infringe on them or myself. Yet when I see the incidents happen that we all know about too well, I just feel as though we need to do something to make an effort to stop it. I don't know what the answer is, but we have to do something. We owe it to the families to at least try something, because it seems these incidents are happening more and more frequently and with more carnage each time. It's as if the psychopaths keep trying to out do each other.

__________________

ukraine-flag-nomonkey-b - QRZ NOW - Ham Radio News



No longer a user - left on their own accord.

Status: Offline
Posts: 766
Date:

PowerStroker wrote:

Well I can definitely see both sides to this. Certainly the overwhelming majority of gun owners are responsible and never cause a problem, and I don't want to infringe on them or myself. Yet when I see the incidents happen that we all know about too well, I just feel as though we need to do something to make an effort to stop it. I don't know what the answer is, but we have to do something. We owe it to the families to at least try something, because it seems these incidents are happening more and more frequently and with more carnage each time. It's as if the psychopaths keep trying to out do each other.


 

And that in a nutshell is EXACTLY what is wrong with the democrats....

 

They always feel compelled to do something....does not matter if what they do is meaningless toward a solution (or completely counterproductive), just so long as they do SOMETHING....

 

Preventing law abiding citizens from having guns only makes the matter WORSE....

 

Most of the carnage you speak of HAPPENS in gun free zones...which becomes an open invitation to those who wish to do harm....

 

I have always been vocal about allowing a gun registry....registering a gun does not infringe the right to own one...registering a gun helps the enforcement side make certain that the wrong person does not obtain a gun...

  

I think requiring a special license or insurance is an infringement...but requiring registration so you can be cross checked against felony list and mentally incapacitated list...


I am generally opposed to the concept of the no fly list as it does not follow due process...

 

I would be in favor of including the no fly list to the felony and mental incapacity list if it were to be amended to follow due process before a citizen could be placed on it...

 

I am 100% okay with it being illegal for a non citizen to possess a fire arm in the US...

 

Once an immigrant is granted full citizenship then they should have all the same rights as a natural born...

 

And if we are unwilling to grant them full rights we should not be granting them citizenship...

 

 



-- Edited by Nuffan on Thursday 9th of May 2019 12:43:54 PM

__________________


CERTIFIED POST WHORE

Status: Offline
Posts: 15923
Date:

PowerStroker wrote:

Well I can definitely see both sides to this. Certainly the overwhelming majority of gun owners are responsible and never cause a problem, and I don't want to infringe on them or myself. Yet when I see the incidents happen that we all know about too well, I just feel as though we need to do something to make an effort to stop it. I don't know what the answer is, but we have to do something. We owe it to the families to at least try something, because it seems these incidents are happening more and more frequently and with more carnage each time. It's as if the psychopaths keep trying to out do each other.


 

Really, are you kidding? 

Things had improved a lot since the wild-wild West, PowerStroker!

There can be no question as to why all these mass shootings occur in "gun-free" zones! It clearly illustrates that weak people prey on the venerable. It's a cold reality I know...



__________________

What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl

 

 



FAR BEYOND DRIVEN

Status: Offline
Posts: 4753
Date:

PowerStroker wrote:

Well I can definitely see both sides to this. Certainly the overwhelming majority of gun owners are responsible and never cause a problem, and I don't want to infringe on them or myself. Yet when I see the incidents happen that we all know about too well, I just feel as though we need to do something to make an effort to stop it. I don't know what the answer is, but we have to do something. We owe it to the families to at least try something, because it seems these incidents are happening more and more frequently and with more carnage each time. It's as if the psychopaths keep trying to out do each other.


 Try enforcing the laws on the books already. Persons who should be reported to NICS are not. Cruz had 7 times the police were there, FBI interviews, neighbors and he was still allowed to buy a gun because no one reported him to NICS not even the FBI who runs NICS! How about Sandy Hook. CT has very strict laws on firearms, must be locked in a safe, it wasn't. Another forget his name, dishonorable discharge, problems, never reported. Was an AF thing I believe.

Quit letting violent offenders out of prison early or because of over crowding, whatever insane reason. How many did Obama release because they weren't "violent offenders" just heavy drug dealers, think they don't have guns and kill? Used to be a capital offense to kill a Police Officer, bring it back and enforce it. Death penalty, 1 appeal not 25 years of appeals.

Stop drugging these kids with ADD drugs and so forth.

MK Ultra (cia mind control) is little known, probably never heard of it on the left. They say 1953-73, bullshit. Easy to create a monster out of a drugged up fuked up kid, have a shooting for the agenda of more gun control. Think that is beyond the gun grabbers and CIA? It's not.

 



__________________
Drive it like you stole it
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard