That is just an ignorant statement, things can change in the span of 24 hours. For example Biden could kick the bucket before the election! It could come out that Kamala has serious issues (something Republicans already know) and Trump could grab another pussy. You just never know!

Voting early is the wrong thing to do! You never make a decision without all the facts! 

But I am sure you just want your carton of cigaretts and bottle of booze for voting Democrat that Soros pays out.

Nice try...

We already know you're a mole for the left.

SCOTUS...

A place where people like you and I are considered to be not worthy of representing ourselves without appointed council.

Okay pal...

Powerstroker for supreme court!

I don't feel the same as PowerStroker, or Shawnee.

I think that RBG was a very poor Jurist in our nations highest court who clung to power until her last dying breath. She must have felt that her needs to feel powerful outweighed the peoples needs for a competent and clear thinking Judge. You cannot tell me that for the last two years that her illness did not get in the way of her performing her job, and I think a lot of people were covering for her.

The last dying wish that Democrats claimed she made, which was to wait until after the election to replace her is preposterous and just solidifies her bigotry and dreams of grandure that were always on full display in the courts. No doubt that this nation has suffered a great deal because of her lust for power and I personally am glad she is no longer holding our nations highest court hostage!

In my dealings with courts, both low and high - it's all the same! A bunch of people who think they are special when it comes to passing judgement. RBG's death should serve as a reminder to all these people that they are not above anything and they too will be judged one day!

My litigation in a lower District court were mared by the same kinds of "professionals" that you speak so highly of. It becomes a miscarage of Justice when the truth is no longer the deciding factor in a case, and that money and high profile attornies and massive law firms can deflect the truth and sidestep Justice! These people on the courts could NEVER be professionals, as the law is but a perception that differes from person to person - really no different than an opinion. 

Unlike YOU PowerStroker, I will take a case to the SCOTUS if it has enough importance to me. I was a few courts shy of such a case in years past. I don't have any respect for a Judge that is incapable of handing down a verdict based on the truth, as many will side with whoever has the largest budget and team of lawyers. Yet that is the way it works in the courts day in and day out. If being a con-artist is your idea of being a "professional" then I will leave that title for you and all the people who subscribe to such a credo.

We already know you're lacking any real character, you parade around giving mouth service to a party who could care less about you. You have no real beliefs outside what your party tells you to believe. When Trump veers from his stated beliefs (aka gets PC), I call him out on it. Never ONCE have I seen you call anyone in your party out, because you are a pathetic, partisan bigot. The lowest of the low.

I guess that doesn't really surprise me. I mean the amount is higher than I imagined, but to hire an elite lawyer who was selected by a SCOTUS judge to clerk for them would definitely command a premium. Especially by a firm that frequently has business before the high court. To gain insight in to how a certain judge thinks about cases could end up being far more valuable than the cost of said hiring bonus. This is just the free market at work.

If you don't like it, do you have any suggestions for a regulation you would propose? Whining about something without proposing a specific solution is just that, whining.

From The National File:

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced the arrests of four individuals, including one county commissioner, in a ballot harvesting scheme that resulted in 134 counts of voter fraud being leveled against them.
Gregg County Commissioner Shannon Brown, Marlena Jackson, Charlie Burns, and DeWayne Ward are all charged with being part of an organized vote harvesting scheme. This voter fraud allegedly took place during the 2018 Democrat Primary Election.
The four are charged with targeting young, able-bodied voters, harvesting their mail-in ballots to cast ballots fraudulently, claiming the voters were disabled. In most cases this was done without the voters knowledge or consent, authorities said.

Just think how much money Soros and company saved this year in Liberal States and Cities with unsolisited mail in ballots! Think of all them buses and community ballot whippers that were not needed in the hood this year! All the extra savings afforded a little extra money for Soros to burn down a few cities and pay for all the people to protest for weeks and months on end! 

I am sure Democrats really feel good about how COVID helped them this election, until of course the high court says what everyone knows - that regardless of a pandemic, war or whatever may be that equal rights to ALL voters is the law of the land. I think we will also come to find that many people who voted probably don't live where their ballot was sent. Election integrety is VERY important regardless what chaos is playing out. The fact COVID was used to pervert the voting integrity in many liberal states and cities is beyond disgusting. The upmost scrutiny should be placed on these liberal cities and states that were trying "new" ways of voting. 

What evidence? It's a well known fact that people who filled out and retruned unsolisited ballots in the mail were granted more rights and protections than the people who voted in person. 

The 900 pound gorilla in the room that no Democrat want's to talk about is the fact that it was mainly in the swing states run by Democrats that decided to change election laws at the last minute. Most of the country was doing business as usual in terms of voting and that is why they were able to generate accurate calls on election night. The SCOTUS will take up the case because precedent needs to be set going foraward because almost half of America has lost faith in national elections. Many states are wondering how this could happen, but we know how it and why it happend. 

For Democrats it would just be a whole lot easier for Trump to concede, but he will not. Had Biden conceded the night of the election while Trump was ahead then none of this would be an issue, but the fix was in and that is why Hillary told Biden not to concede. It doesn't help that people like Soros were offering to buy votes from ex-cons (specifically black ones) in exchange for paying off their court fines. 

I think the SCOTUS will take up the issue, there are a lot of conservatives on the bench who were treated very poorly by Democrats during their confermation. They are well aware of the depths Democrats will sink and the lies that they will try and peddle as truth. 

 

Eyes on Gettysburg.

Don't trust mail in. Go to the poll or stay home and don't vote. During the primary looked like we needed absentee so ordered one. The envelope had a huge bold black R on it. Why? Alert cheaters in usps to not deliver? Counters to toss or hide? Why weren't poll watchers  allowed to watch? Anyway we did get a open poll and I went, cancelled the absentee and voted in person primary and Nov 3rd

 

 

 

Don't you think if there were a liberal conspiracy to rig the election, we would have knocked off McConnell, Graham, and Collins at the same time?