All NINE SCOTUS Justices found upon appeal that cheating Liberal states like Colorado, Illinois and other states who Trump has accused of cheating elections in the past -- have been bitch smacked by a RARE unanimous SCOTUS ruling that cheating Liberal States do not pick the President -- that the VOTERS decide! This is MAJOR! The whole country just watched as Colorado and Illinois tried to CHEAT an election by keeping Trump off the ballot illegally!
I hate to say it but Liberal States like New York and Georgia will no doubt soon get smacked down by the SCOTUS also! The BRAZEN cheating by Colorado and Illinois was bad enough, but New York and Georgia took it MUCH further by politically targeting Trump in both Criminal and Civil litigation -- most of which has fallen appart except for that one Judge who is making a mockery out of the entire state of New York with his weaponized non-Jury civil case. The ONLY thing that these trials are doing is making a lot of people lose faith in the Judiciary -- they shouldn't have allowed to them to carry on this far.
I think all nine SOCTUS Justices nailed this ruling and I applaud their bi-partianship! It's really a glorious sign to have ALL NINE agree! Brings back some faith in the Judiciary -- at least at the highest court in the land!
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
It wasn't an attempt to cheat, it was merely the states using their authority to determine eligibility to run. States have always disqualified people who were too young to run for office for example, but age isn't the only disqualifying factor. Having engaged in insurrection is specifically mentioned in the Constitution as another disqualifying factor and some states were merely trying to enforce that provision. The Supreme Court decided to clarify the issue to say that the states can't disqualify an insurrectionist if they are running for a federal office, but can bar an insurrectionist from running for state office. They also went on to say that only the Federal government can bar an insurrectionist from running for federal office. But they also went a step farther by saying only Congress can do that - which is what caused 4 justices (including a conservative) to argue that was an overreach by the court in their opinion, and I agree.
Also, the Supreme court left in place the Colorado finding that Trump did in fact engage in insurrection, denying Trumps attempt to have that finding reversed. What does that tell you?
Regarding Trump's indictments, those are a criminal matter, not a political one.
-- Edited by PowerStroker on Tuesday 5th of March 2024 10:50:33 AM
I appreciate your celebratory comments Stellar, they reveal much, & perhaps the decision is warranted...
But let's not forget that these people SCOTUS are more powerful than your POTUS, & are not even elected into service by-the-people, so that in itself is criminal activity, & likely the biggest bogus administration your so-called "democratic rebublic" than not even granting the most simplest means of fairness & equality, where 1 x vote = 1 x person with equal weight.
The swamp is large, & there's lots of shyte in there, clean it out, don't feed into it would be my suggestion.
Here's a reminder of how it goes down, so you remember it needs fixing...
And lets nor forget about these folks either...
__________________
"Only an alert & knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial & military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods & goals, so that security & liberty may prosper together". Dwight D.Eisenhower.
It wasn't an attempt to cheat, it was merely the states using their authority to determine eligibility to run. States have always disqualified people who were too young to run for office for example, but age isn't the only disqualifying factor. Having engaged in insurrection is specifically mentioned in the Constitution as another disqualifying factor and some states were merely trying to enforce that provision. The Supreme Court decided to clarify the issue to say that the states can't disqualify an insurrectionist if they are running for a federal office, but can bar an insurrectionist from running for state office. They also went on to say that only the Federal government can bar an insurrectionist from running for federal office. But they also went a step farther by saying only Congress can do that - which is what caused 4 justices (including a conservative) to argue that was an overreach by the court in their opinion, and I agree.
Also, the Supreme court left in place the Colorado finding that Trump did in fact engage in insurrection, denying Trumps attempt to have that finding reversed. What does that tell you?
Regarding Trump's indictments, those are a criminal matter, not a political one.
It was an attempt to cheat, one that failed! Save your merely's for your liberal pals.
The Supreme court DID NOT leave in place the Colorado finding that Trump did in fact engage in insurrection! You're such a little bullshitter! You can try and double talk it all you want -- the FACT is that Trump has NOT been convicted of insurrection -- nor will he EVER! He was amune from prosecution on J6 as the sitting POTUS, and the Supreme Court knows this too. The SCOTUS didn't even touch Colorado's basis or reasoning because it was MOOT! It was moot because Trump has never been found guilty of said crime.
Furthermore, these partisan and highly political "indictments" are not FEDERAL indictments... they are highly partisan collusions by heavy Democrat districts with the sole purpose of trying to influnce or cheat a future election! If ever there was any real RICO crimes it was with the cases in NY and Georgia. If Trump wins in 2024 I sure wouldn't want to be ANY of them people.
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
Where exactly in the Supreme Court ruling does it vacate the Colorado court's finding of fact that Trump engaged in insurrection? The SCOTUS ruling only removed their jurisdiction to disqualify on the matter, but left in place their finding of fact.
That he hasn't been "convicted" of insurrection - (yet), doesn't mean he hasn't been found by a court to have engaged in one. A few courts have made that finding actually. He wasn't "convicted" of rape either, but he is still an adjudicated rapist per a civil court's finding of fact. The only reason he isn't in prison for rape is because he wasn't prosecuted criminally for it. A person could call him a rapist publicly and have no fear of a defamation lawsuit, because the ultimate defense against defamation is the truth. One only need to reference the civil court's finding for all the truth required.
Furthermore, you do realize Colorado is a purple state that frequently chooses people from both parties, and it was REPUBLICANS who sued in Colorado to have Trump removed from the ballot right? Democrats had nothing to do with it.
Still think cheating is involved? If so, you may want to vote for a more honest (and less rapey) party this time around. And maybe stop watching Fox "News."
-- Edited by PowerStroker on Wednesday 6th of March 2024 12:33:58 AM
The rape or genocide parties to choose from, out of a country filled with 320-million people...
Lets go Brandon !
__________________
"Only an alert & knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial & military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods & goals, so that security & liberty may prosper together". Dwight D.Eisenhower.
"Only an alert & knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial & military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods & goals, so that security & liberty may prosper together". Dwight D.Eisenhower.
If you are dissatisfied like me with Biden's support of Israel, I'm sure you'd much prefer having the Republicans in charge who would line up every single Palestinian for a firing squad, including the children. Would Republicans then become the genocide party, or is that title reserved exclusively for the guy who just air dropped food over Gaza?
-- Edited by PowerStroker on Thursday 7th of March 2024 10:13:37 AM
The US-of-A is only there, because your largest export is military weapons...And you're supporting Israel since they're your greatest customer, & they illegally started building housing on Palestinian land...
There's no need for war in today's world, & I'd rather see these idiots ( both sides ) fight until there's no-one-left, & without US-of-A intervention...Then there's no more war !
But when there's a dollar to be made...
As a further example, the US-of-A dropped more bombs on Vietnam than was used in WW-II...
"Only an alert & knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial & military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods & goals, so that security & liberty may prosper together". Dwight D.Eisenhower.
The military industrial complex generally needs to be kept in check, I agree with that. Except when Russia invades a neighboring democracy, then it's time to crank up production across the board and make sure that while the invading forces may not necessarily meet American soldiers on the battlefield, they will meet with an unlimited amount of American artillery raining down upon them. Making the human cost ridiculously high is unfortunately the only thing some tyrants seem to understand... And the only thing that can inspire people to throw off the tyranny and regain the democracy that was stolen from them. The Russian people lost their democracy, and I hope they manage to get it back someday.
Did our selling of arms to Israel begin under Biden, and if not, have you labeled any other American presidents with the term genocide?
Rex got awful quiet once I showed him who really filed the lawsuit in Colorado lol.
R1. Absolutely, as the late, great, & dearly missed POTUS Eisenhower explicitly warned about.
R2. Regretfully, the US-of-A broke its own treaties made in the 1990's by secretly loading countries NATO or otherwise with US-of-A missiles. That's illegal, but part of the New World Order plan, as indicated in the 1991 US-of-A Defence Strategy, as quoted once again below...
R3. Democracy is a farce, it never existed, we seem to pretend that it exists, whilst we all live in fear of the use of weapons of mass destruction. It's simply a term used by the US-of-A as a psy-op, to mislead their people in believing so.
R4. The Russians never had it, though over the centuries, they've tried all sorts of things. The deal today however, is that the don't lie to the people as much as the US-of-A does.
R5. The late 1800's & the Spanish war(s) saw how powerful the US-of-A had become, & how money can be made from lots of war. This realization is what enticed the Central Banks of Europe to cast more than just an eye on your country. That's why they infiltrated, & now have you in perpetual debt...And also the reason you need to tell them to *uck-off. Secret societies & their members ( Bankers, Kazarian Jews etc ) ensured that Israel would always be protected & serviced militarily by the US-of-A. That's what the UN was formed for, & we've always had war since, whether in the middle-East or elsewhere. It's quite ironic to have the NAZI's on one-hand infiltrate your country after WW-II, & yet be funded by Kazarian Jews. But that's how it is, & some Jews could care less, money & power are more important. I would have worse labels to attach to some Presidents than just genocidal psycopath's or supporters of such PowerStroker I'm very sorry to say...The Extraterrestrial reality & its secrecy is a main cause of all this shyte, but it is coming to a close.
R6. Our host lives in "virtual reality", & who could blame him ?... He might pop-in over the weekend maybe lol !
-- Edited by Rastus on Friday 8th of March 2024 04:31:50 AM
__________________
"Only an alert & knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial & military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods & goals, so that security & liberty may prosper together". Dwight D.Eisenhower.
*** Apologies for my above post, it was a cut & paste from a quoted post including PowerStroker's edited quote, that wouldn't submit, as I'm being censored at times here, once again...
Also, I couldn't load-up, attatch, or even cut & paste, the "1991 US-of-A Defence Strategy Policy" as indicated in the post, once again. due to being censored...But I've posted it many times, look around in here.
So as you see, is this freedom of speech ???
You say "Democracy", I say "Hypocrisy"...
Red Flag !
-- Edited by Rastus on Friday 8th of March 2024 06:26:47 AM
__________________
"Only an alert & knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial & military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods & goals, so that security & liberty may prosper together". Dwight D.Eisenhower.
If you are dissatisfied like me with Biden's support of Israel, I'm sure you'd much prefer having the Republicans in charge who would line up every single Palestinian for a firing squad, including the children. Would Republicans then become the genocide party, or is that title reserved exclusively for the guy who just air dropped food over Gaza?
Five people were killed from that air-drop as some parachutes did not deploy properly.
Rex got awful quiet once I showed him who really filed the lawsuit in Colorado lol.
Please... I voted for Romney once upon a time -- look at what a disappointment he has been to the party.
No, the truth is that Democrats enjoy the luxury of having the most ignorant of constituents -- they just need a cause to go out and play in the highway, and they don't really care what that cause is... so long as they "think" they are towing the party line.
For example, check out this new statue dedicated to George Floyd.
R6. Our host lives in "virtual reality", & who could blame him ?... He might pop-in over the weekend maybe lol !
There really hasn't been much in the media that has been too inspiring lately... much of it just makes me sick, really... and this is a GLOBAL view -- not just related to the USA
The whole damn world has gone MAD!
Who was it that said, "I feel like I'm living in a trailer of common sense and start out the window at a tornado of stupidity"?
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
*** Apologies for my above post, it was a cut & paste from a quoted post including PowerStroker's edited quote, that wouldn't submit, as I'm being censored at times here, once again...
Also, I couldn't load-up, attatch, or even cut & paste, the "1991 US-of-A Defence Strategy Policy" as indicated in the post, once again. due to being censored...But I've posted it many times, look around in here.
So as you see, is this freedom of speech ???
You say "Democracy", I say "Hypocrisy"...
Red Flag !
There is no censorship going on by my hand... Sometimes I edit my OWN post to correct spelling here and there, but whenever I make anything outside of spelling changes I'll time stamp it as edited. That's it -- that is all!
Oh and yes, I delete spam obviously... and in the instance someone gets bored and starts talking to the bots I'll deactivate a posted link from any new account that comes around peddling links.
I think a lot of your issues in pasting in articles has to do with formatting and HTML code that is carrying over from whatever 3rd world - dark website you're fooling around with at the moment. LOL
I mean let's be honest, there is really no telling what kind of crap you'll surface with from the rabbit hole -- or how deep you went to get it! But I can tell you this, in the case of formatting issues -- even I have issues with this from time to time.
Some sites are unfriendly when it comes to copying and pasting -- others use different formatting which might take some skill to tweek out in the HTML parts. I don't disagree with you that quoting and such can be hard work and time consuming, but you can always screen shot whatever you're looking at -- upload it to a free hosting site (so long as it's not some 3rd world server blocked by most of the internet) and it will post here just as you are seeing it on your screen.
I don't run the internet you know -- I don't even run this place in terms of hosting and managing the software. I'm just some guy who was kicked off all the other forums and had to have somewhere to go... and here we are!
Screen shots are your friend Rastus -- you're just prolly trying to spread fake Russian propoganda and you don't even know it. I know you seem to put a lot of trust in Putin -- but does he offer any websites that offer freedom of the press?
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
I wasn't suggesting yourself Stellar, but it does happen, especially when the 1991 Defence Strategy is mentioned, as it instantly calls-the-bluff on matters, & makes your gov't look like war-criminals & psycopaths, which they clearly are.
There's no bullshyte to hind behind when people read that, as its an almanac.
Don't be duped.
The way forward is CE-5, personal development, meditation ( if possible ), the 4096Hz frequency ( listen once a day ), grab a Vogel-cut-quartz-crystal ( tune-in, & send out positive thoughts), & speak with the Spirit photographs that I've posted here & there. I'll resubmit these into the Spirit thread, so people have a 1-stop-place to visit & or copy-&-paste the images for their own use. It's never been easier to hook-up with the truth & spirit.
We will win.
__________________
"Only an alert & knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial & military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods & goals, so that security & liberty may prosper together". Dwight D.Eisenhower.