The Constitution specifically bans poll taxes of any kind. Unless we are giving out free ID's to everyone, and even coming to people who are disabled to provide them free ID's on site, it would constitute a poll tax and therefore be unconstitutional.
READ MY LIPS POWERSTROKER -- proving you're a citizen and having ID is not a TAX! It's a responsibility!
SELLC wrote:
Sad times when PowerStroker is sticking up for Mitch! I think we need to know who on the Senate is going to break ranks on this issue so we can vote them out in the next mid-terms!
The Save Act is common sense policy! People like Bernie Sanders and Gavin Newscum saying they can't find their birth certificates? I'm calling BULLSH!T!
I recently had to produce my birth certificate AND Social Security card to obtain a "real ID" -- as if the one I had for the last 34 years wasn't "real" enough to pass TSA muster for in country air travel!
I HAVE ZERO COMPASSION AT THIS POINT FOR PEOPLE NOT WILLING TO OBTAIN THEIR DOCUMENTS! I had to jump through all kinds of hoops to get my documents in order to obtain my Real ID!
If people can't be an adult and obtain their vital records -- they have no business voting! Furthermore, if they don't have documents to prove citizenship -- they shouldn't be voting! Period!
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
Putting tampons and litter boxes in the bathrooms was the last straw for me... but by that time my kids only had a few years left in public school so we suffered through it.
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
Look, before we get too far off the path -- I just want to say that it's a REALLY BAD IDEA for Democrats to be defunding homeland security while we have a major war going on in the Middle East!
What is wrong with your party, PowerStroker?
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
ICE still has a several billion dollar slush fund they got as part of the Big Beautiful Bill. I'd use that money to fund the rest of Homeland. Once that runs out, then perhaps Trump can come to Congress and explain himself and ask for more money.
The Constitution specifically bans poll taxes of any kind. Unless we are giving out free ID's to everyone, and even coming to people who are disabled to provide them free ID's on site, it would constitute a poll tax and therefore be unconstitutional.
Shawnee, what PowerStroker FAILS to understand is that a birth certificate AND Social Security card are issued to the parents after birth.
If they misplace, wore out or even lost their originals -- that's not anyones fault but their own! They must replace them!
Replacing them is EASY! But only if you are a natural born citizen! You just go to the county records department that the hospital you were born in resides and you can get your birth certificate!
The same holds true for your Social Security card! You can visit almost any branch to get a replacement card! Just call the Social Security number and they will get you an appointment!
If you don't like the time it takes to obtain these documents, I'd suggest not losing them or having deadbeat parents. In either case these documents are still required and you WILL need them!
The cost to replace your documents in either case is the same -- YOUR PROBLEM! No different than if you misplaced your License or other ID! There is a fee to replace and or renew them!
IT'S NOT A POLL TAX!
What PowerStroker is trying to suggest, which is the cost and time involved in "replacing" your birth certificate or Social Security card is some sort of "poll tax" is really nothing more than a COP OUT! It's laughable because clearly it's just more Democrat BS!
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
Birth certificates and Social Security cards aren't photo ID's. As I understand the language of the proposed Save Act, you also need to bring a photo ID to prove you are the rightful holder of the birth certificate or Social Security card. And if a married woman's last name is different on her driver's license than it is on her birth certificate, she can be denied voter registration. The vast majority of women don't bother having a court perform a legal name change when they marry, they just go to the DMV to update the name on their drivers license. Did Brandee go to court for a legal name change after she married you?
As I've stated before. I don't mind people having to prove citizenship when they first register to vote. But the current language of the bill leaves far too many opportunities for the inappropriate and partisan purging of voter rolls. All you have to do is clean up the language in the bill to fix the obvious problems, and it would probably pass in a bipartisan manner. The only reason you guys could possibly be unwilling to clean up the legislative language, is if you WANT to inappropriately purge voter rolls, and that's unacceptable.
We have already been over this whole marriage issue! Brandee has able to get an "Enhanced License" without issue using her original birth certificate and an original copy of her marriage certificate -- along with her old "regular, non-enhanced" drivers license.
What you suggest is an OUTRIGHT LIE being circulated by Democrats! But you have no problems lying, seeings how you all like to cheat elections by selling out your own country to illegal aliens. You act like the whole nation isn't on to your scam and the scary part is -- you live in Minnesota! Ground zero for the grift! The gull you have.
It used to be back in my days that you were REQUIRED to be a United States citizen to obtain a regular drivers license... you had to show your birth certificate, social security card and some bills to prove your current address! It wasn't until you Democrats started passing your own State level laws that would see people being able to obtain a drivers license without such basic vetting. There are many reported instances of Democrat States issuing CDL's with no name whatsoever! Thus, a Federal "Real ID" requirement came into necessity after 9/11 to ensure people getting on planes were who they actually said they were. Think about that for a minute, PowerStroker! Your party has caused this mess! Because people who shouldn't have been able to get a drivers license or ID, are in fact given State ID that has allowed them to also use said ID to vote in elections they most certainly weren't qualified to partake in -- at least at the Federal level! People who have cheated these once were protections using State ID's in liberal States SHOULD BE PURGED FROM VOTER ROLLS! What the heck is wrong with you? An illegal or a non-citizen who skirted such protections should not be "grandfathered" any right to illegally voting! Furthermore, registering to vote is SIMPLE providing you have the right to vote! Checking your status is just as easy also!
What you and your party want is to keep allowing non-citizens and illegals to keep voting! And that is just not acceptable! It's an outright national security risk! It's pure insanity!
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
No, my party doesn't want non citizens to vote. We just look at statistics of how often it happens and haven't yet seen a case where it swung an election. The numbers are microscopic, so enacting mass policy that inconveniences people doesn't seem like a good use of our time.
How can you even type this crap ^^^ with a straight face?
You live in Minnesota! Ground zero for breaking how serious this problem with election integrity has become -- how deep it runs and how badly we are being taken advantage of!
When it comes to making US elections iron clad secure you say "Why bother, it's an inconvenience!"... meanwhile when it comes to Iran invading our embassy and killing Americans back in 1979 you'll fight tooth and nail to protect Iran!
If you can't see this, get help PowerStroker! I'm telling you this as a friend! You may have contracted the Woke Mind Virus and I fear it has metastasized into TDS!
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
Elections are trustworthy here. Medicare fraud happens all over the country, it's just that it was brown people this time that got the right wing media all up in a tizzy.
Shawnee, what PowerStroker FAILS to understand is that a birth certificate AND Social Security card are issued to the parents after birth.
If they misplace, wore out or even lost their originals -- that's not anyones fault but their own! They must replace them!
Replacing them is EASY! But only if you are a natural born citizen! You just go to the county records department that the hospital you were born in resides and you can get your birth certificate!
The same holds true for your Social Security card! You can visit almost any branch to get a replacement card! Just call the Social Security number and they will get you an appointment!
If you don't like the time it takes to obtain these documents, I'd suggest not losing them or having deadbeat parents. In either case these documents are still required and you WILL need them!
The cost to replace your documents in either case is the same -- YOUR PROBLEM! No different than if you misplaced your License or other ID! There is a fee to replace and or renew them!
IT'S NOT A POLL TAX!
What PowerStroker is trying to suggest, which is the cost and time involved in "replacing" your birth certificate or Social Security card is some sort of "poll tax" is really nothing more than a COP OUT! It's laughable because clearly it's just more Democrat BS!
No, it's not a poll tax. Libs deflect, distort reality. Charging you to enter the poll would be. He whined about married names. Bring BC, DL and Marriage cert fixes it. Too lazy, don't vote.
He's still running around other threads trying to suggest married women with birth certificates and marriage licenses would be denied voter ID... he knows it's not true but he is still spreading the false propaganda.
He's not even married, so I don't get what skin he has in the marriage game anyway! Just something he parrots to carry water for his party I suppose.
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
This might sound like a strange concept to you, but I actually care about people other than myself. And if the marriage thing isn't true, then what is your aversion to cleaning up the legislative language in the bill to make it abundantly clear?
Okay PowerStroker... let's settle this once and for all!
Please state the exact "language" you're having a hard time understanding... and for extra credit, please enlighten us to exactly how it needs to be dumbed down for your party to understand it.
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
Specifically in the legislative language, I'm concerned about this part of section 2:
"(1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking Each State motor vehicle driver's license application and inserting Subject to the requirements under section 8(j), each State motor vehicle driver's license application;
Here is my concern:
"Meanwhile, voting rights advocate groups say the SAVE Act may prevent U.S. citizens from registering to vote by raising unnecessary barriers. A 2023 survey conducted by the Brennan Center for Justice, a nonpartisan law and policy institute, and other groups found that over 9% of voting-age American citizens do not have easy access to documents that prove their citizenship, including a passport, birth certificate or naturalization certificate.
That percentage was slightly higher 11% for Americans who did not identify as white. The survey defined easy access as being able to quickly find such documents if people had to show it tomorrow.
The Brennan Center has also warned that people who have changed their name, such as married women, may be blocked from registering to vote because of discrepancies between their ID and birth certificate."
And honestly there is an easy way to fix the married woman problem... Just add a provision in the language that requires states to automatically update a woman's voter registration with her new name when she goes to the DMV to put her married name on her drivers license. Then it becomes a non issue that the states are responsible for dealing with, and won't inconvenience a woman by requiring her to bring her marriage license with her every time she goes to vote.
You can't possibly object to that can you?
And regarding the citizens who don't have their own copy of their birth certificate for whatever reason, perhaps some of that is their responsibility, and I would suggest that if we can spend 2 billion per day in Iran without even a vote in Congress, perhaps we can add a provision to the Save act that reimburses citizens for the costs of obtaining the documentation they need up to a set dollar amount?
I don't think I'm out of line here.
-- Edited by PowerStroker on Thursday 26th of March 2026 03:51:09 PM
It is simply taking your birth certificate down to your local Social Security office with your marriage license and having it changed!
That's it!
Then once it's changed you go down to your Secretary of State (or DMV) and they will change your license!
So you have to bring paperwork to your local Social Security office, and then to the DMV, and once you've done that, you can update your voter registration.
It sounds like a sneaky way to get a percentage of people to just stop voting if you ask me.
Does your entire premise of this issue boil down to people just being too lazy to produce required and important vital records?
GTFOH!
You don't have to get a drivers license, but you can't legally drive if you don't!
You don't have to get a marriage license, but you can't legally be wed if you don't!
You don't have to register to vote, but you can't legally vote if you don't!
Do you see a pattern here PowerStroker? Getting your vital records, valid state ID and Social Security card is VERY easy if you're here legally! Sure there are some hoops, but that is only if you lost your original birth records!
And you know whose fault that is?
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
You're right, the Constitution doesn't say non-citizens can vote. Which by the way is extremely rare and a felony. All that's needed is to enforce existing laws.
See, that's just the thing. Being able bodied and financially well off aren't supposed to be prerequisites for voting. It's essentially discrimination against disabled and poor people.
Poor and disabled people generally don't fly anywhere. Hell, they can't even get to their local Social Security office or DMV. That doesn't mean they should lose their vote.
Just because someone is disabled doesn't mean we should allow Democrats to take advantage of them!
A majority of them don't even care to vote, but you people... you'll go pick them up, give them a bottle of booze and a carton of cigarettes to get on a bus and vote.
On the way to said polling stations you probably fill their heads with liberal BS lies and videos. Most of them are usually so out of it you only hope they can remember what they were told 10 minutes ago!
Then you guys got a taste of mail in ballots, where you could ensure they voted properly by filling them out for them! And you'd save on the bus rental!
This is BS! I've had to re-count ballots before in Detroit -- I know what the ballots look like that are filled out in districts with heavy-handed Democrat extortion -- this was BEFORE mail in ballots for all after COVID.
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
They may have been doing it for awhile, but should the save act pass they won't be doing it anymore! At least for Federal portions of the ballot!
And that is the way I think it should be! If you don't care enough to vote on Election Day in person, you really aught not be voting anyway!
Kids get the day off school in most big elections, people volunteer their time to run the polls -- it's a big deal! Mail in voting for anyone other than deployed military is really all that should be allowed without some hoops.
__________________
What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl
The Constitution specifically bans poll taxes of any kind. Unless we are giving out free ID's to everyone, and even coming to people who are disabled to provide them free ID's on site, it would constitute a poll tax and therefore be unconstitutional.
They are free now. If you are missing anything like your BC, there is now a program that puts the burden on the state. Cost is zero.