Who should be responsible for paying back tariffs collected after todays SCOTUS ruling? - Auto-Trend Repairs and Service Information Forums

Shawnee_B · FAR BEYOND DRIVEN

RE: Who should be responsible for paying back tariffs collected after todays SCOTUS ruling?

Shawnee_B · FAR BEYOND DRIVEN

PowerStroker wrote:
Pharmaceutical puberty blockers and hormone treatments are not sex change operations. I'm not aware of any current elected officials in my state that are pedophiles, promoted sex changes on children, or were involved in the missing 9 billion either. In fact, they are investigating and prosecuting the people involved in the fraud.

-- Edited by PowerStroker on Friday 27th of February 2026 01:05:00 PM

It's mutilation of their body regardless, against God's plan for his children. He wanted little boys to grow up as men, not grow tits and have no facial hair, no testerone.

Shawnee_B · FAR BEYOND DRIVEN

PowerStroker wrote:
Nothing, we just don't share your bigotry.

It's not bigotry, it's Gods word.

Shawnee_B · FAR BEYOND DRIVEN

PowerStroker wrote:
What would Jesus say about your comments? I don't recall any passage in the Bible where he ever uttered anything like what you say.

He didn't because it was a given. Gods word is forever, not you freaks whims.

PowerStroker · UNSTOPPABLE!

Shawnee_B wrote:
These very bigoted people wrote down Gods word, so you are calling God a bigot.

No, I just don't have full faith in the bigoted people of the day who allegedly wrote it down. God spoke directly with Moses and gave him 10 commandments to share with mankind. Homosexuality wasn't mentioned in them. If it was such a big deal, you'd think there would have been an eleventh commandment about it. Then, a long time later when he sent his son, Jesus made no mention of it either. It seems it's not such a big deal to them otherwise they would have specifically spoken on the issue.

I know there are passages in the Bible that speak negatively about it, but to be a Christian is to follow the teachings of Jesus, he made no mention of it. It seems to me, that the true blasphemy, is to attribute ones bigotry to a person who never took a stand on the issue either way. The verse in Matthew you reference as a New Testament justification for bigotry is vague at best. To use it as justification for bigotry, runs contrary to all of the other teachings of Jesus we know.

And straight Christian people get STD's too, so that's a junk argument. Just ask Kid Rock.

Shawnee_B · FAR BEYOND DRIVEN

PowerStroker wrote:
Shawnee_B wrote:
These very bigoted people wrote down Gods word, so you are calling God a bigot.
No, I just don't have full faith in the bigoted people of the day who allegedly wrote it down. God spoke directly with Moses and gave him 10 commandments to share with mankind. Homosexuality wasn't mentioned in them. If it was such a big deal, you'd think there would have been an eleventh commandment about it. Then, a long time later when he sent his son, Jesus made no mention of it either. It seems it's not such a big deal to them otherwise they would have specifically spoken on the issue.
I know there are passages in the Bible that speak negatively about it, but to be a Christian is to follow the teachings of Jesus, he made no mention of it. It seems to me, that the true blasphemy, is to attribute ones bigotry to a person who never took a stand on the issue either way. The verse in Matthew you reference as a New Testament justification for bigotry is vague at best. To use it as justification for bigotry, runs contrary to all of the other teachings of Jesus we know.
And straight Christian people get STD's too, so that's a junk argument. Just ask Kid Rock.

Go march in a gay parade then. I gave you some links, check them out, it explains it how Christians see it.

PowerStroker · UNSTOPPABLE!

I am a Christian, and it's not how I see it.

Perhaps the son is more progressive than the father. If that's the case, and if the saving of our souls depends on accepting the son as our lord and savior... Wouldn't it behoove us all to follow the teachings of the son and to live by his example?